Criticality Part 2: Bifurcations, Universality, and Self-Organization#
Introduction#
- Recap of Part 1: tipping point vs. continuous criticality
- What’s missing: the geometric picture, why different systems share exponents, systems that find criticality on their own
- Goal: connect phenomenological classification to deeper mathematical frameworks
Bifurcations: The Deterministic Skeleton#
Phase Portraits and Fixed Points#
- State space, trajectories, attractors
- Fixed point stability: linearization and eigenvalues
- Basins of attraction: which initial conditions lead where
Catalog of Local Bifurcations#
Saddle-Node Bifurcation#
- Normal form: $\dot{x} = r + x^2$
- Two fixed points collide and annihilate
- The canonical “tipping point”—no smooth return
- Examples: extinction thresholds, financial crises, regime shifts in ecosystems
Transcritical Bifurcation#
- Normal form: $\dot{x} = rx - x^2$
- Two fixed points exchange stability
- Connection to exponential growth model from Part 1
Pitchfork Bifurcation#
- Supercritical: $\dot{x} = rx - x^3$ (smooth symmetry breaking)
- Subcritical: $\dot{x} = rx + x^3$ (discontinuous jump)
- Connection to continuous vs. tipping point criticality
Hopf Bifurcation#
- Fixed point gives way to limit cycle
- Supercritical vs. subcritical variants
- Examples: oscillations in predator-prey systems, electrical circuits
Global Bifurcations#
- Homoclinic and heteroclinic bifurcations
- Why local analysis isn’t always enough
- Catastrophe theory: Thom’s classification
Interactive: Bifurcation Explorer#
- Phase portrait that deforms as control parameter changes
- Visualize fixed point creation/destruction/stability exchange
- Show corresponding bifurcation diagram
From Bifurcations to Statistical Mechanics#
The Role of Many Degrees of Freedom#
- Single ODE → lattice of coupled units
- Fluctuations and noise enter naturally
- Mean-field theory: averaging over neighbors recovers bifurcation-like equations
Landau Theory of Phase Transitions#
- Free energy as a function of order parameter
- Equilibrium: minimize free energy
- Taylor expansion near transition: $F(m) = a(T)m^2 + bm^4 + \ldots$
- Connection to pitchfork bifurcation
Order Parameter Behavior Near Criticality#
- Power-law scaling: $m \sim |T - T_c|^\beta$
- Critical exponent $\beta$ characterizes the transition
- Mean-field prediction vs. reality: fluctuations matter in low dimensions
Correlation Length and Susceptibility#
- Correlation length $\xi$: how far do fluctuations propagate?
- $\xi \sim |T - T_c|^{-\nu}$ diverges at criticality
- Susceptibility $\chi \sim |T - T_c|^{-\gamma}$: response to perturbations diverges
- Critical slowing down: relaxation time also diverges
Universality: Why Details Don’t Matter#
The Puzzle#
- Liquid-gas transition in water and magnetization in iron follow same power laws
- Microscopic physics completely different
- How can this be?
What Determines Universality Class#
- Dimensionality of space
- Symmetry of order parameter (scalar, vector, etc.)
- Range of interactions (short vs. long range)
- What doesn’t matter: lattice structure, precise interaction strengths, chemical details
The Renormalization Group Idea#
Coarse-Graining#
- Block spins: average over small regions
- Ask: what effective Hamiltonian describes the coarse-grained system?
- Iterate: zoom out repeatedly
RG Flow and Fixed Points#
- Parameters flow under coarse-graining
- Fixed points of the flow = scale-invariant systems = critical points
- Behavior near fixed point determines critical exponents
Intuitive Picture#
- At criticality, zooming out doesn’t change statistical properties
- The system “looks the same” at all scales
- This self-similarity is the origin of power laws
Scaling Relations#
- Critical exponents aren’t independent
- Relations like $\alpha + 2\beta + \gamma = 2$ (Rushbrooke)
- Follow from self-consistency of RG picture
- Reduces number of independent exponents
Table of Universality Classes#
| Class |
Examples |
$\beta$ |
$\nu$ |
$\gamma$ |
| 2D Ising |
Uniaxial magnets, lattice gas |
1/8 |
1 |
7/4 |
| 3D Ising |
Liquid-gas, binary mixtures |
~0.326 |
~0.630 |
~1.237 |
| Mean-field |
High dimensions, long-range |
1/2 |
1/2 |
1 |
| 2D Percolation |
Porous media, networks |
5/36 |
4/3 |
43/18 |
| 3D Percolation |
Composite materials |
~0.41 |
~0.88 |
~1.80 |
Fractals at Criticality#
Why Fractals Emerge#
- No characteristic length scale at $p_c$ or $T_c$
- Structures must be self-similar
- Fractal geometry is the natural description
Fractal Dimension#
- Definition: $M(L) \sim L^{d_f}$ where $d_f$ is fractal dimension
- For percolation cluster at $p_c$: $d_f < d$ (spatial dimension)
- 2D percolation: $d_f = 91/48 \approx 1.896$
- The cluster fills space “incompletely”
Fractal Dimension as Critical Exponent#
- Related to other exponents through scaling relations
- $d_f = d - \beta/\nu$ connects geometry to thermodynamics
- Measuring $d_f$ gives information about universality class
Examples of Critical Fractals#
- Percolation clusters at threshold
- Ising domain boundaries at $T_c$
- Coastlines and river networks (approximately)
- Diffusion-limited aggregation
Interactive: Box-Counting on Critical Cluster#
- Generate percolation cluster at $p = p_c$
- Overlay boxes of decreasing size
- Plot $\log N$ vs. $\log (1/\epsilon)$
- Slope gives fractal dimension
Self-Organized Criticality#
The Tuning Problem#
- In standard criticality: must tune control parameter precisely to $p_c$
- But power laws appear everywhere in nature
- Who is doing the tuning?
SOC: Criticality Without Tuning#
- Some systems naturally evolve toward critical state
- Separation of timescales is key: slow drive, fast relaxation
- System “self-organizes” to the boundary between stability and instability
The BTW Sandpile Model#
Rules#
- 2D lattice, each site has “sand grains” $z_{ij}$
- Slowly add grains at random sites
- If $z_{ij} \geq 4$, site topples: loses 4 grains, neighbors each gain 1
- Toppling can trigger neighbors → avalanche
- Grains fall off at boundaries
Emergent Behavior#
- System reaches statistical steady state
- Avalanche size distribution follows power law: $P(s) \sim s^{-\tau}$
- No characteristic avalanche size
- Always poised at criticality
Other Examples of SOC#
- Earthquakes: Gutenberg-Richter law $P(E) \sim E^{-b}$
- Forest fires: burned area distribution
- Mass extinctions: species loss events
- Neural avalanches in brain activity
- Solar flares: energy release distribution
Controversies and Limitations#
- Is true SOC common, or are power laws often misidentified?
- Many claimed power laws don’t survive rigorous statistical testing
- Alternative mechanisms: finite-size effects, superposition, tuning to different points
- SOC requires specific conditions: slow drive, fast relaxation, no characteristic scale in driving
Interactive: Sandpile Simulation#
- Add grains one by one
- Visualize avalanches as they propagate
- Plot avalanche size histogram (log-log)
- Show approach to power-law distribution
Synthesis: A Unified View of Criticality#
The Common Thread#
- Criticality = diverging correlation length = loss of characteristic scale
- Power laws, fractals, and scale invariance are manifestations of same phenomenon
- Universality: only symmetry and dimension matter near the fixed point
Hierarchy of Descriptions#
Bifurcation Theory (deterministic, low-dimensional)
↓ add noise, many degrees of freedom
Mean-Field / Landau Theory (averaged, approximate)
↓ include fluctuations properly
Renormalization Group (full critical behavior)
↓ special dynamics
Self-Organized Criticality (criticality as attractor)
Mapping the Landscape#
| Framework |
Tipping Point |
Continuous Transition |
| Bifurcations |
Saddle-node, subcritical |
Supercritical pitchfork, transcritical |
| Phase transitions |
First-order |
Second-order (continuous) |
| Order parameter |
Discontinuous jump |
Power-law approach to zero |
| Correlation length |
Finite |
Diverges |
| Hysteresis |
Often present |
Absent |
| Critical exponents |
Not applicable |
Universal values |
Early Warning Signals#
- Approaching tipping points: critical slowing down
- Variance and autocorrelation increase before transition
- Flickering between states
- Potential for prediction and intervention
Open Questions#
- Criticality in non-equilibrium systems: active matter, driven systems
- Quantum criticality: phase transitions at zero temperature
- Criticality and computation: is the brain critical? Why might this be advantageous?
- Machine learning on critical systems: can neural networks learn critical exponents?
Conclusion#
- Criticality connects dynamical systems, statistical mechanics, and geometry
- The same mathematical structures appear across physics, biology, and social systems
- Understanding criticality gives tools for prediction, control, and recognizing universal patterns
- Much remains unknown, especially in non-equilibrium and living systems
Sources#
- Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos by Steven H. Strogatz
- Statistical Mechanics by James Sethna (especially Chapter 12 on RG)
- Scale Invariance and Beyond edited by Dubrulle, Graner, Sornette
- How Nature Works by Per Bak (original SOC book)
- Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences by Didier Sornette
- Clauset, Shalizi, Newman: “Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data” (arXiv:0706.1062)